Two tools that look like technical apparatus and are not. A partition of unity chops a global problem into local ones and glues the answers back together with no seams; it is the device that will make integration on manifolds possible at all. Change of variables explains where the Jacobian factor in every polar and spherical integral comes from: it is the local volume distortion of the substitution.
Local statements are the ones you can prove; global ones are the ones you want. A partition of unity is the standard bridge, and it is available in smooth geometry precisely because smooth bump functions exist — something that fails in the analytic or holomorphic categories.
Finite element methods build global basis functions exactly this way. Blending weights in graphics, mixture models, and domain decomposition in numerical PDE all use the same partition-of-unity idea. Change of variables is behind every density transformation in probability.
Euler and Lagrange used substitution freely; a correct general proof took until the nineteenth century, and it is still one of the harder theorems in an undergraduate course. Partitions of unity became standard with Whitney and the rise of differential topology in the 1930s.
Let $\varphi(t)=e^{-1/t}$ for $t>0$ and $\varphi(t)=0$ for $t\le0$. Then $\varphi$ is $C^\infty$ on $\mathbb{R}$.
Every derivative on $t>0$ has the form $p(1/t)e^{-1/t}$ for a polynomial $p$, and $e^{-1/t}$ beats every polynomial as $t\to0^{+}$. So all derivatives extend continuously by $0$. Note $\varphi$ is not analytic at $0$: its Taylor series there is identically zero and does not represent it.
From $\varphi$ build $\psi(x)=\varphi(1-\|x\|^2)$: smooth, strictly positive on the open unit ball, and identically zero outside it. Rescaling and translating gives a smooth bump supported in any ball you like, and normalising makes it $1$ on a smaller concentric ball.
Let $A\subseteq\mathbb{R}^n$ and let $\mathcal{O}$ be an open cover of $A$. A $C^\infty$ partition of unity on $A$ subordinate to $\mathcal{O}$ is a collection $\Phi$ of smooth functions $\rho:\mathbb{R}^n\to[0,1]$ such that
For any $A\subseteq\mathbb{R}^n$ and any open cover, such a partition exists.
Sketch: exhaust $A$ by compact pieces, cover each piece by finitely many balls each inside a member of the cover, take a bump function for each ball, and normalise by dividing by the (locally finite) sum. Local finiteness is what makes the sum a genuine function.
To define $\int_Af$ when $A$ is not a box: write $\int_Af=\sum_\rho\int\rho f$. Each $\rho f$ is supported in one small set where you already know what to do, the sum is locally finite, and the answer is independent of the partition chosen. This is exactly the argument Unit 13 will use to integrate over a manifold covered by charts.
Let $U\subseteq\mathbb{R}^n$ be open and $g:U\to\mathbb{R}^n$ be an injective $C^1$ map with $\det Jg(x)\ne0$ on $U$. Then for every integrable $f$ on $g(U)$,
The absolute value matters: volume is unsigned, and orientation is not tracked here. Unit 13 will drop the absolute value once forms give it a place to record the sign.
$g(r,\theta)=(r\cos\theta,r\sin\theta)$ has $\det Jg=r$, so
for the disc of radius $R$. The factor $r$ is not a convention: it is the rate at which polar boxes stretch as you move outwards.
Let $I=\int_{\mathbb{R}}e^{-x^2}dx$. Then $I^2$ is a double integral over the plane, and in polar coordinates it becomes $\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^\infty e^{-r^2}r\,dr\,d\theta=2\pi\cdot\tfrac12=\pi$. So $I=\sqrt\pi$. The whole trick is the $r$ from the Jacobian, which makes the radial integral elementary.
With $g(\rho,\varphi,\theta)=(\rho\sin\varphi\cos\theta,\rho\sin\varphi\sin\theta,\rho\cos\varphi)$ the determinant is $\rho^2\sin\varphi$, so the volume of the ball of radius $R$ is $\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\pi}\int_0^{R}\rho^2\sin\varphi\,d\rho\,d\varphi\,d\theta =\tfrac43\pi R^3$.
• Dropping the absolute value on $\det Jg$. Without it, an
orientation-reversing substitution flips the sign of a volume.
• Substituting into the integrand but forgetting the Jacobian
factor.
• Using a non-injective substitution over a set of positive measure. The
formula then counts part of the image twice.
• Forgetting to transform the region as well as the integrand. The new
limits are $g^{-1}$ of the old region.
• Treating a partition of unity as an infinite sum problem. Local
finiteness makes every evaluation a finite sum.
Original problems written for this guide in the style of Spivak and Munkres exercises. Write a full solution before opening the answer.
Use $x=au$, $y=bv$ to find the area of $x^2/a^2+y^2/b^2\le1$.
Evaluate $\int_S(x+y)\,dA$ where $S$ is the parallelogram with vertices $(0,0),(1,1),(2,1),(1,0)$.
Construct a smooth function that is $1$ on $\|x\|\le1$ and $0$ for $\|x\|\ge2$.
Set up the integral for the volume of the unit ball in $\mathbb{R}^n$ and find it for $n=4$.
Why is the polar map still usable despite failing injectivity?
Evaluate $\int_S xy\,dA$ over the region bounded by $xy=1$, $xy=4$, $y=x$, $y=4x$ in the first quadrant.
Why must a partition of unity be locally finite?
If $X$ has density $p$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$ and $Y=g(X)$ for a diffeomorphism $g$, what is the density of $Y$?
Course coverage. This unit is part of the complete MAT257Y1 topic map. It should cover the following items before you move on:
Spivak proves change of variables in full and it is one of the longest arguments in the book; Munkres splits it into digestible lemmas. Both build partitions of unity first. Check the syllabus for which proof is examinable.
Bump functions give partitions of unity, which localise the change of variables proof and later make integration on manifolds well defined. The inverse function theorem supplies the local diffeomorphisms that both arguments run on.
Use these after the main practice set. They are designed to force definition-level reasoning, theorem selection, and mixed application rather than routine calculation only.
What does $|\det Jg(x)|$ measure?
Why can no analytic function be a bump function?
What does "subordinate to a cover" mean?
Why the absolute value on the determinant?